CCAPS and MailChimp
Posted: October 26th, 2011, 9:44 pm
I have asked many questions, and Cristian and Jason have been very patient with me, but now, i am getting confused and i think i am getting my developper scratching his head!
I have s2M and use ccaps (currently, i have 2 products but might get a couple more in the future). I am also using MailChimp as it integrates nicely. But that is where the "problems" arrive.
If i want to use ONE single list in MC, and use their flexible segmentation feature, i have to get s2M to incorporate the different ccaps or product name (or whatever identifies the different products) into merge field. This is not readily available, from what i understand but Jason gave a workaround in this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=14727&p=33399
However, information is NOT updated if the member's status changes, but only when they register, so what if the member purchases 2 products? It might not be accurate on the list.
If i want to use MULTIPLE lists (one for all, one for everyone who purchased, one for those who purchased product A, one for those who purchased product B, etc.). It seems that answer would be in this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=15345 but then, as i asked the support staff at MailChimp, if one person unsubscribes from the unsubscribe email link of an email, they might not be removed from all the lists they are on, and therefore might still get emails from another list and place a complaint. My developper says it is possible to have all instances of the member's listing removed from all the lists at once because of how s2M works. Support at MC didn't know enough about s2M to think so. And in any case, if the information is still not changed when the member's status changes, i am stuck.
So, since i am that confused, since there is not obvious simple way to manage multiple fields/lists to match different ccaps/products, and no guarantees that the status of the member (therefore any merged field in MC) is updated, what would you suggest? Wait until s2M integrates those?
I really dont want to ask my developper to work on something that would work only halfway because of some limitations of either MC or s2M, nor work on something that would be fully integrated in a next s2M update, etc. That is why, he is scratching his head right now. I cannot make up my mind, but i feel like there is not ONE clear cut solution. What do you think? What would you suggest?
I have s2M and use ccaps (currently, i have 2 products but might get a couple more in the future). I am also using MailChimp as it integrates nicely. But that is where the "problems" arrive.
If i want to use ONE single list in MC, and use their flexible segmentation feature, i have to get s2M to incorporate the different ccaps or product name (or whatever identifies the different products) into merge field. This is not readily available, from what i understand but Jason gave a workaround in this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=14727&p=33399
However, information is NOT updated if the member's status changes, but only when they register, so what if the member purchases 2 products? It might not be accurate on the list.
If i want to use MULTIPLE lists (one for all, one for everyone who purchased, one for those who purchased product A, one for those who purchased product B, etc.). It seems that answer would be in this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=15345 but then, as i asked the support staff at MailChimp, if one person unsubscribes from the unsubscribe email link of an email, they might not be removed from all the lists they are on, and therefore might still get emails from another list and place a complaint. My developper says it is possible to have all instances of the member's listing removed from all the lists at once because of how s2M works. Support at MC didn't know enough about s2M to think so. And in any case, if the information is still not changed when the member's status changes, i am stuck.
So, since i am that confused, since there is not obvious simple way to manage multiple fields/lists to match different ccaps/products, and no guarantees that the status of the member (therefore any merged field in MC) is updated, what would you suggest? Wait until s2M integrates those?
I really dont want to ask my developper to work on something that would work only halfway because of some limitations of either MC or s2M, nor work on something that would be fully integrated in a next s2M update, etc. That is why, he is scratching his head right now. I cannot make up my mind, but i feel like there is not ONE clear cut solution. What do you think? What would you suggest?